UFC 106: The Postmortem
UFC 106 has come and gone and it’s getting weighed and measured. Overall, I thought it was a pretty decent event as far as the fights were concerned. A couple of upsets and some good battles balanced with a few controversial moments and a predictable main event made for an O.K. night. Just the hardcore fans last night made it over to the house, which makes me interested in what the PPV numbers are going to be like. It may have just been an off night here.
Now see what the press and fans are saying…
Dana White shocked by UFC 106 judging… – MMAJunkie.com
Griffin outstrikes Ortiz at UFC 106 – USA Today
‘Robbery’ victim Tito doesn’t go into the night quietly – Steve Cofield, Cagewriter/Yahoo! Sports
Judging controversy shrouds Griffin’s win – Globe and Mail
(UFC 106) A question or two about the Nevada State Athletic Commission – Zach Arnold, FightOpinion.com
After Another Loss, Sun Begins to Set on… Tito Ortiz – Mike Chiapetta, MMA FanHouse
Ortiz/Griffin 3 in the works? – MMA Weekly
UFC 106 Post-Fight Analysis and Recap – Mike Fagan, Bloody Elbow
Despite impressive win… Koscheck won’t leapfrog challenger… – MMAJunkie.com
Interesting Mix of Success for Old Guard and New Blood… The Garv
Koscheck Campaigns for St. Pierre – Loretta Hunt, Sherdog.com
MMA, Boxing, K-1, Fight Sports | Kevin November 22, 2009
2 Comments to “UFC 106: The Postmortem”
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Loading ...
By Brian, November 23, 2009 @ 6:22 am
The only thing I could say I was surprised by when it comes to the judging at UFC 106 was the fact that one of the judges gave Griffin a 30-27 score. I definitely had Griffin winning rounds 1 and 3, but I would say Ortiz did enough to win at least round 2.
By Blue, November 23, 2009 @ 11:00 am
I agree with you Brian! It just sux that the judging has become “BOXING” if you catch what I’m sayin! The judges are gettin worse and worse! I bet them fuckers get paid waaaaay to much for what they are NOT good at ha! All in all, nice fight night!!!